DON'T BLAME ME!
Leave me a note!
My Most Recent Entries:
My Online Photo Albums:
(This site has been closed. IbeLooking
for a new place. Stay tuned.)
Other Places I'd like you to visit:
If you want to know how it all began, click HERE for the FIRST entry. At the top of each post you can click "NEXT ENTRY" and so on. It might make a bit more sense that way, and you might stumble upon one of my better postings in case this one sorta just sucks!
Tuesday, Nov. 04, 2008 - 9:53 P.M.
I'd like to know how the hell they can be projecting B.O. the winner of, say, Virginia by a margin of 50% to 49% when only 91% of the votes have been counted. Seriously? Does that take into account early votes? Absentee votes? Military votes? If so, doesn't it seem AWFULLY odd that those votes could be accounted for so quickly? Ohio is claiming B.O. and less than half of the votes are counted, by a narrow margin of 51%-47%! What the fuck? Don't give me that shit about exit polls, that's bullshit, it's not fact. Something is very very suspicious here. I'm not pulling the Democratic whine-song "THEY'RE CHEATING!" It's going both ways, I'm just saying that it makes no sense that a winner can be declared when less than 1/2 of the votes are counted and the margin is close. Why isn't anyone questioning this????
Won't you PLEASE leave your feedback here?
0 readers left their mark on this one!